6/20/2023 0 Comments Gallipoli moorehead![]() ![]() It concentrates mainly on the tactical and command aspects of the campaign and Australian readers might be disappointed at the relative lack of information about the role of their soldiers. It is true that Moorehead wrote with the flair of an experienced journalist and, for the general reader who wants to gain a feel for the campaign and those who conducted it, his book provides an interesting and readable overview. Moorehead's Gallipoli, he wrote, was the work of "'a brilliant journalist, not an historian". ![]() In the introduction to his 1999 edition, Rhodes James wrote that although he was at first very impressed with Moorehead's study, a second reading led him to a different conclusion. Two of the best known general histories of the campaign are Alan Moorehead's 1956 book Gallipoli and Robert Rhodes James's 1965 book of the same name. ![]() Much of what has been written is of interest mainly to specialists, but for those who wish to learn more about the campaign there is a wealth of material available. Some material deals with a specific aspect of the campaign, while other works discuss the campaign as a whole, or incorporate the Gallipoli story into broader histories of the First World War. Many people, however, would be unaware of the sheer volume of material that has been published about Gallipoli. ![]() It is taught in school, and stories about Anzac abound. Almost every Australian has some knowledge of the Gallipoli campaign. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |